These tools and metrics are designed to help AI actors develop and use trustworthy AI systems and applications that respect human rights and are fair, transparent, explainable, robust, secure and safe.
Sentence Similarity is a metric that quantifies the semantic resemblance between two sentences. It is particularly relevant in natural language processing (NLP) tasks such as information retrieval, semantic search, text clustering, and conversational AI. By representing sentences as embeddings in a high-dimensional space, this metric allows models to compare how closely related two sentences are in meaning, rather than just syntactic similarity.
Formula:
The similarity between two sentence embeddings, A and B, can be calculated using various distance metrics. The most common ones are:
1. Cosine Similarity:
Cosine similarity measures the cosine of the angle between two vectors, A and B. Values range from -1 (completely dissimilar) to 1 (exact match in direction).
Formula:
Cosine Similarity = (A • B) / (||A|| * ||B||)
Where:
• “A • B” represents the dot product of vectors A and B.
• “||A||” and “||B||” represent the magnitudes of vectors A and B.
2. Euclidean Distance (less commonly used in practice but relevant for some applications):
Euclidean distance measures the straight-line distance between the two points (embeddings) in vector space.
Formula:
Euclidean Distance = √(∑(Aᵢ - Bᵢ)²)
Lower values indicate higher similarity in this metric.
Example Usage:
Consider the task of finding sentences most similar to the query sentence: “Machine learning is fascinating.”
Input Sentences to Compare:
1. “Artificial intelligence is a thrilling field.”
2. “Machine learning applications are expanding rapidly.”
3. “I enjoy learning new things.”
Using a sentence similarity model (e.g., sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2 from Hugging Face), we can generate embeddings for each sentence and calculate the cosine similarity between the query and each of these sentences.
Output (Cosine Similarity Scores):
• “Artificial intelligence is a thrilling field.” — 0.72
• “Machine learning applications are expanding rapidly.” — 0.89
• “I enjoy learning new things.” — 0.33
The sentence with the highest score (“Machine learning applications are expanding rapidly”) is identified as the most similar in meaning to the query.
Applications:
1. Information Retrieval: Sentence similarity models can be used to rank documents or passages based on their relevance to a query, improving the quality of search engine results.
2. Semantic Search: Similarity models allow users to retrieve documents that match the semantic meaning of a query rather than relying only on exact keyword matches.
3. Text Clustering and Categorization: By grouping semantically similar sentences, models can categorize and organize large text corpora efficiently.
4. Question Answering and Chatbots: In question-answering systems, similarity metrics can match user questions with the most relevant answers, enhancing response accuracy.
5. Paraphrase Detection and Plagiarism Detection: These models can identify if two sentences convey the same meaning, which is helpful in detecting paraphrasing or plagiarism.
Impact:
The use of sentence similarity has significantly enhanced NLP applications by allowing models to operate at a semantic level, providing more contextually appropriate and relevant results. This has broad implications, especially for user-centric applications such as search engines, virtual assistants, and content recommendation systems. By understanding semantic intent, sentence similarity metrics contribute to a more intuitive and human-like interaction between machines and users, improving user satisfaction and system efficiency.
References
Cer, D., Yang, Y., Kong, S., Hua, N., Limtiaco, N., St. John, R., … & Kurzweil, R. (2018). Universal Sentence Encoder. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.11175.
Reimers, N., & Gurevych, I. (2019). Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.10084.
Kiros, R., Zhu, Y., Salakhutdinov, R., Zemel, R., Urtasun, R., Torralba, A., & Fidler, S. (2015). Skip-Thought Vectors. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 3294-3302).
Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018). BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805.
Pennington, J., Socher, R., & Manning, C. D. (2014). GloVe: Global Vectors for Word Representation. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (pp. 1532-1543).
About the metric
You can click on the links to see the associated metrics
Metric type(s):
Objective(s):
Purpose(s):
Target sector(s):
Lifecycle stage(s):
Usage rights:
Target users:
Risk management stage(s):
Github stars:
- 15200
Github forks:
- 2500
