Catalogue of Tools & Metrics for Trustworthy AI

These tools and metrics are designed to help AI actors develop and use trustworthy AI systems and applications that respect human rights and are fair, transparent, explainable, robust, secure and safe.

RAI Toolkit: Governance Workflows for AI Agents



Most governance frameworks tell organizations what trustworthy AI requires but not how to produce evidence that a specific system meets those requirements. This toolkit closes that gap for production generative and agentic AI. It provides workflows that connect risk scoping, evaluation harnesses, red-team exercises, and human review gates into a single release process, so every deployment decision is backed by dated, inspectable evidence. Its mappings link concrete evaluation and red-team results to NIST AI RMF functions, EU AI Act obligations, and MIT AI Risk Repository categories, letting engineering, risk, and compliance teams work from one artifact. Released open source in 2026 with a companion practical guide, "Governance Workflows for AI Agents," and an accompanying webinar. It runs on any evaluation and observability layer and is in use by practitioners across finance, HR technology, and consulting.

 

About the tool


Developing organisation(s):







Country/Territory of origin:





License:




Stakeholder group:




Geographical scope:




Technology platforms:


Tags:

  • ai governance
  • eu ai act
  • ai red teaming
  • responsible ai
  • AI Governance & Policy
  • responsible ai framework
  • red teaming
  • audit trail
  • nist ai rmf
  • ai evaluation
  • ai governance · shadow ai · eu ai act · gdpr · dora · nis2 · saas intelligence · compliance · european compliance · risk classification
  • agentic ai
  • llm observability
  • human oversight

Modify this tool

Use Cases

There is no use cases for this tool yet.

Would you like to submit a use case for this tool?

If you have used this tool, we would love to know more about your experience.

Add use case
Partnership on AI

Disclaimer: The tools and metrics featured herein are solely those of the originating authors and are not vetted or endorsed by the OECD or its member countries. The Organisation cannot be held responsible for possible issues resulting from the posting of links to third parties' tools and metrics on this catalogue. More on the methodology can be found at https://oecd.ai/catalogue/faq.