Catalogue of Tools & Metrics for Trustworthy AI

These tools and metrics are designed to help AI actors develop and use trustworthy AI systems and applications that respect human rights and are fair, transparent, explainable, robust, secure and safe.

RAIL-HH-10K



RAIL-HH-10K is a dataset for training and evaluating the safety of large language models. It contains 10 000 conversations, each with two responses to the same prompt: a harmful or lower-quality response, and a safer response. Both responses are scored on eight ethical dimensions: fairness, safety, reliability, transparency, privacy, accountability, inclusivity and user impact. Most safety datasets only label which of two responses is preferred. RAIL-HH-10K also records why, dimension by dimension.  

The conversations are drawn from Anthropic’s HH-RLHF dataset of human-assistant dialogues. Each record includes the conversation history, the user’s prompt, the two responses and an overall score for each response. For every dimension, each response receives a score from 0 to 10, a confidence value, a written explanation and a list of the specific problems found. Inter-annotator agreement is reported at Krippendorff’s alpha of 0.80. The harmful responses cover violence, crime, sexual content, misinformation, privacy violations and discrimination, and are graded by severity.

The data is split into training (8 000), validation (1 000) and test (1 000) sets, available in JSON, CSV and Parquet formats. It can be used to fine-tune models using preference-based methods such as reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) or direct preference optimisation (DPO), or as a benchmark for multi-dimensional safety evaluation. Because it contains harmful content, the developers recommend research use with access controls. The dataset is released under the MIT licence.

Auto-discovered on 2026-10-14 by OECD Catalogue Automation

Use Cases

There is no use cases for this tool yet.

Would you like to submit a use case for this tool?

If you have used this tool, we would love to know more about your experience.

Add use case
Partnership on AI

Disclaimer: The tools and metrics featured herein are solely those of the originating authors and are not vetted or endorsed by the OECD or its member countries. The Organisation cannot be held responsible for possible issues resulting from the posting of links to third parties' tools and metrics on this catalogue. More on the methodology can be found at https://oecd.ai/catalogue/faq.