PRINCIPLES AND IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF SYSTEMS BASED ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE FEDERAL PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

LOS PRINCIPIOS Y GUÍA DE ANÁLISIS DE IMPACTO PARA EL DESARROLLO Y USO DE SISTEMAS BASADAS EN INTELIGENCIA ARTIFICIAL EN LA ADMINISTRACION PUBLICA FEDERAL

Start date :2018
End date :
Name of responsible governmental body :
  • National Digital Strategy Coordination (;Coordinación de la Estrategia Digital Nacional)
  • Subcommittee on Artificial Intelligence (CIDGE;Subcomisión de Inteligencia Artificial de la Comisión Intersecretarial para el Desarrollo del Gobierno Electrónico)
  • Mexican Secretariat of the Civil Service (SFP;Secretaría de la Función Pública)
Description :
  • In order to strengthen the responsible and ethical use of Artificial Intelligence for the common good, this guide was developed.
Mexico flag
Objectives:
  • To monitor and evaluate the impacts of AI systems in order to ensure that they achieve the expected results.
  • To promote transparency, by explaining to the users that interact with AI systems the decision process taken by such systems, the expected benefits as well as the potential risks derived from using such systems.
  • To protect privacy, by incorporating mechanisms of control and consent for the use of data during the design of AI systems.
  • To foster equality, by reducing risks of discriminatory biases derived from the utilised data.
  • To ensure due process, by allowing individuals to dispute decisions made by AI systems.
OECD AI principle adressed:
  • Inclusive growth, sustainable development and well-being
  • Human-centred values and fairness
  • Transparency and explainability
  • Robustness, security and safety
  • Accountability
Relevant policy area covered:
  • N.A
Estimated budget expenditure (range per year):
  • Not applicable
Background including shifts in the policy initiative:
  • In November 2018, the Mexican government published a document that includes general principles for the development and use of systems based on AI in Mexico’s federal government.
Policy initiative is a structural reform:
  • No
Evaluated:
  • No
Link to evaluation or reports:
  • N.A
Funding from the private sector:
  • No
Type of evaluation:
  • N.A
Evaluation provides input to:
  • N.A
Evaluation performed by:
  • N.A
Policy instruments :

Public consultations of stakeholders or experts

  • Type : Public consultations of stakeholders or experts
  • Name in English :
  • Country : Mexico
  • Stakeholders contribute to : Problem definition | Policy objective formulation | Policy design
  • Method : Expert groups/committees

Emerging AI-related regulation

  • Type : Emerging AI-related regulation
  • Name in English :
  • Country : Mexico
  • Role of government : Protector of public values
  • Challenge(s) addressed : Risks to human safety (e.g. prevention of physical and mental harm) | Risks to fairness (e.g. non-discrimination, gender equality, fairness and diversity)
  • Type(s) of regulation : Self-regulation (e.g. codes of conduct, guidelines, standards)
  • Regulatory approach : Technology-based regulation (e.g. moratoria, bans, standards of use)
  • Level of governance : National
  • Approach to monitor compliance : Regulated parties are incentivised to adopt monitoring technology that is not managed by the regulator
Last updated : Sep 9, 2022
OECD and European Commission Logo