- National Digital Strategy Coordination (;Coordinación de la Estrategia Digital Nacional)
- Subcommittee on Artificial Intelligence (CIDGE;Subcomisión de Inteligencia Artificial de la Comisión Intersecretarial para el Desarrollo del Gobierno Electrónico)
- Mexican Secretariat of the Civil Service (SFP;Secretaría de la Función Pública)
- In order to strengthen the responsible and ethical use of Artificial Intelligence for the common good, this guide was developed.
- To monitor and evaluate the impacts of AI systems in order to ensure that they achieve the expected results.
- To promote transparency, by explaining to the users that interact with AI systems the decision process taken by such systems, the expected benefits as well as the potential risks derived from using such systems.
- To protect privacy, by incorporating mechanisms of control and consent for the use of data during the design of AI systems.
- To foster equality, by reducing risks of discriminatory biases derived from the utilised data.
- To ensure due process, by allowing individuals to dispute decisions made by AI systems.
- Inclusive growth, sustainable development and well-being
- Human-centred values and fairness
- Transparency and explainability
- Robustness, security and safety
- Accountability
- N.A
- Not applicable
- In November 2018, the Mexican government published a document that includes general principles for the development and use of systems based on AI in Mexico’s federal government.
- No
- No
- N.A
- No
- N.A
- N.A
- N.A
Public consultations of stakeholders or experts
- Type : Public consultations of stakeholders or experts
- Name in English :
- Country : Mexico
- Stakeholders contribute to : Problem definition | Policy objective formulation | Policy design
- Method : Expert groups/committees
Emerging AI-related regulation
- Type : Emerging AI-related regulation
- Name in English :
- Country : Mexico
- Role of government : Protector of public values
- Challenge(s) addressed : Risks to human safety (e.g. prevention of physical and mental harm) | Risks to fairness (e.g. non-discrimination, gender equality, fairness and diversity)
- Type(s) of regulation : Self-regulation (e.g. codes of conduct, guidelines, standards)
- Regulatory approach : Technology-based regulation (e.g. moratoria, bans, standards of use)
- Level of governance : National
- Approach to monitor compliance : Regulated parties are incentivised to adopt monitoring technology that is not managed by the regulator