The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
A Waymo autonomous vehicle in San Francisco malfunctioned, taking passenger Darren Findling into a parking garage filled with other robotaxis and leaving him temporarily stuck and confused. The incident caused disruption and distress, requiring intervention from Waymo support to resolve the situation.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event clearly involves an AI system (Waymo's autonomous vehicle) whose malfunction (incorrect routing into a parking garage) directly impacted a passenger by causing inconvenience and potential distress. Although no physical harm occurred, the passenger was temporarily stuck and the AI system failed to perform as intended, which fits the definition of an AI Incident due to harm to the person (inconvenience, potential distress) and malfunction of the AI system during use. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident rather than a hazard or complementary information.[AI generated]