13-Year-Old Arrested in Greece for AI-Generated Child Pornography

The event explicitly mentions the use of Artificial Intelligence to create child pornography, which is a severe violation of human rights and causes significant harm to the victim. The distribution of this AI-generated illegal content constitutes direct harm and a breach of applicable laws protecting fundamental rights. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident due to the direct involvement of AI in causing harm and legal violations.

The event involves the use of an AI system by the minor to generate child pornography, which is a clear violation of laws protecting minors and constitutes harm to the victim's rights and dignity. The AI system's use directly led to the creation and distribution of harmful content, fulfilling the criteria for an AI Incident under violations of human rights and harm to individuals. Therefore, this is classified as an AI Incident.

The event involves the use of an AI system to generate illegal and harmful content (child pornography) depicting a minor, which directly violates fundamental rights and laws protecting children. The AI system's use in creating and distributing this content has directly led to harm to the victim and legal consequences, qualifying this as an AI Incident under the framework.

The event involves the use of an AI system to generate illegal child pornography, which constitutes a violation of fundamental rights and legal protections for children. The AI system's use directly led to harm to the victim and the distribution of harmful content, meeting the criteria for an AI Incident under violations of human rights and legal obligations.

The event involves the use of an AI system to generate illegal child sexual abuse material, which constitutes a violation of laws protecting minors and personal data, thus causing harm to the victim. The AI system's use directly led to the creation and distribution of harmful content, fulfilling the criteria for an AI Incident under violations of human rights and harm to individuals. Therefore, this event qualifies as an AI Incident.

The event explicitly involves the use of an AI system to generate illegal child pornography, which is a clear violation of laws protecting fundamental and labor rights, specifically the rights of children. The AI system's use directly led to harm to the victim child and the community by creating and distributing abusive content. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident due to realized harm caused by the AI system's use.

The event involves the use of an AI system to create illegal and harmful content (child sexual abuse material) that directly harms a minor and violates legal protections. The AI system's use in generating this content and its distribution constitute an AI Incident under the definitions, as it directly led to harm to a person and breaches of applicable law.

The event involves the use of an AI system to generate illegal child pornography by manipulating an image of a minor, which was then distributed, causing harm to the victim and violating legal protections. This constitutes an AI Incident because the AI system's use directly led to harm (violation of rights and harm to the child) and illegal activity involving AI-generated content.

The event involves the use of an AI system to generate illegal pornographic content involving minors, which directly leads to harm by violating the rights and dignity of the child victim. The AI system's use in creating manipulated content that was distributed constitutes an AI Incident under the category of violations of human rights and applicable law protecting fundamental rights, specifically child protection laws.

The event involves the use of an AI system to generate illegal and harmful content (child pornography) that was distributed, causing direct harm to the victim and violating fundamental rights. The AI system's use directly led to harm, qualifying this as an AI Incident under the framework definitions.

The event explicitly mentions the use of AI tools to create child pornography, which is a direct harm to the victim and a violation of laws protecting children and human rights. The AI system's use in generating illegal content and distributing it constitutes an AI Incident under the framework, as it directly led to harm and legal violations. The involvement of AI in producing and spreading harmful content is central to the incident, not merely background information or potential future harm.

The event explicitly involves the use of AI to create illegal and harmful content (child pornography), which directly harms the victim and breaches legal and human rights protections. The AI system's use in generating the content is central to the incident, and the harm has already occurred, making this an AI Incident under the framework definitions.

The event explicitly involves the use of an AI system to create child pornography, which is a serious violation of human rights and applicable law. The AI system's use directly led to harm to the victim and the distribution of illegal content, fulfilling the criteria for an AI Incident under violations of human rights and breach of legal obligations.

The event involves the use of an AI system to create illegal and harmful content (child pornography), which directly leads to violations of human rights and legal protections. The AI's role in generating the manipulated video is central to the harm caused. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident due to the direct harm and legal violations resulting from the AI-generated content.

The event involves the use of an AI system to create illegal and harmful content (child pornography), which directly leads to harm to the victim and breaches legal protections. The AI system's use in generating and distributing this content constitutes an AI Incident under the definitions provided, as it directly caused harm and violated rights.

The event explicitly involves the use of an AI system to create illegal child pornography, which constitutes a violation of fundamental rights and causes significant harm to the victim (an 11-year-old child). The AI system's use directly led to the creation and distribution of harmful content, fulfilling the criteria for an AI Incident under violations of human rights and harm to individuals.

The event explicitly mentions the use of artificial intelligence to generate illegal child pornography content, which constitutes a violation of human rights and applicable laws protecting minors. The AI system's use in creating this content directly caused harm to the victim and led to legal action. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident under the framework, as the AI system's use directly led to significant harm involving violations of rights and illegal content distribution.

The event involves the use of an AI system to create illegal child sexual abuse material, which constitutes a violation of fundamental rights and legal protections for children. The AI system's use directly led to harm to the victim and the distribution of illegal content, fulfilling the criteria for an AI Incident under violations of human rights and applicable law.

The event explicitly mentions the use of artificial intelligence to create child sexual abuse material, which is a direct violation of human rights and applicable laws protecting minors. The AI system's use in generating illegal content and its distribution has directly led to harm to the victim and community. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident under the framework, as the AI system's use has directly led to significant harm.

The event explicitly involves the use of an AI system to create child pornography, which constitutes a violation of fundamental rights and causes significant harm to the victim. The AI system's use directly led to the creation and distribution of illegal content, fulfilling the criteria for an AI Incident under violations of human rights and harm to individuals. Therefore, this is classified as an AI Incident.

The event explicitly involves the use of an AI system to create illegal child pornographic material, which constitutes a violation of fundamental rights and causes direct harm to the victim child. The AI system's use in generating this harmful content and its distribution fulfills the criteria for an AI Incident under the definitions provided, as it directly leads to harm and legal violations.

The event involves the use of an AI system to create illegal and harmful content (child sexual abuse material) involving minors, which is a clear violation of human rights and applicable laws. The AI system's use directly led to harm to the victim and the involvement of law enforcement, meeting the criteria for an AI Incident under violations of human rights and harm to individuals. Therefore, this event is classified as an AI Incident.

The event involves the use of an AI system to generate illegal and harmful content (child sexual abuse material) targeting a minor, which constitutes a violation of human rights and legal protections. The AI system's use directly led to harm to the victim and legal consequences for the perpetrator, fitting the definition of an AI Incident.

The event involves the use of an AI system to generate illegal and harmful content (child sexual abuse material) by manipulating a minor's image. This directly violates human rights and legal protections concerning child pornography and personal data. The AI's role in creating the illicit content and its distribution constitutes an AI Incident due to realized harm to the victim and breach of laws protecting fundamental rights.

The article describes a case where a 13-year-old was involved in the creation and distribution of child pornography generated using AI, specifically by manipulating a photo of an 11-year-old. This clearly involves an AI system used to produce harmful and illegal content, leading to violations of laws protecting minors and their rights. The harm to the victim and the legal implications confirm this as an AI Incident under the framework, as the AI system's use directly led to harm and legal violations.

The event explicitly involves the use of AI to create illegal and harmful content (child pornography) and its distribution, which directly causes harm to the victim and violates legal and human rights protections. The AI system's use in generating the manipulated video is central to the incident, fulfilling the criteria for an AI Incident due to realized harm (violation of rights and harm to individuals).

The event explicitly involves the use of an AI system to generate illegal child sexual abuse material, which constitutes a direct violation of human rights and causes harm to the victim. The AI system's use in creating and distributing this content directly led to harm, fulfilling the criteria for an AI Incident under violations of human rights and harm to individuals.

The event explicitly involves the use of an AI system to create illegal child pornography, which is a direct violation of human rights and causes significant harm to the individuals involved. The distribution of this content further exacerbates the harm. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident due to the direct harm caused by the AI-generated content and its distribution.

The event involves the use of an AI system to create illegal child sexual abuse material, which constitutes a violation of fundamental rights and causes harm to the victim. The AI system's use directly led to the creation and distribution of harmful content, fulfilling the criteria for an AI Incident under violations of human rights and harm to individuals.

The article describes a 13-year-old who used AI technology to create and distribute child pornography involving an 11-year-old victim. The AI system's use in generating manipulated images directly caused harm, including violation of the victim's rights and harm to the community through distribution of illegal content. This meets the criteria for an AI Incident as the AI system's use directly led to significant harm and legal consequences.

The event explicitly mentions that the child pornography material was created through artificial intelligence, indicating the involvement of an AI system in generating harmful content. The sharing and distribution of this content led to legal action, indicating realized harm related to violations of rights and potentially harm to the individuals involved. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident due to the direct involvement of AI-generated illegal content causing harm and legal consequences.

The event involves the use of an AI system to create illegal and harmful content (child pornography), which directly harms the victim and breaches laws protecting minors. The AI's role in generating the manipulated images is central to the incident, fulfilling the criteria for an AI Incident due to violations of fundamental rights and harm to individuals.

The event involves the use of an AI system to create illegal child sexual abuse material, which constitutes a violation of fundamental rights and laws protecting children. The AI system's use directly led to harm to the victim and the community through distribution of the content. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident due to the realized harm and legal violations caused by the AI-generated content.

The event explicitly involves the use of AI to create manipulated child pornography, which is a serious violation of human rights and applicable laws protecting minors. The AI system's use directly led to harm to the victim and the distribution of illegal content, constituting an AI Incident under the framework's definition of harm to persons and violation of rights.

The event explicitly mentions the use of artificial intelligence to create illegal and harmful content involving minors, which was then disseminated online. This constitutes a direct AI Incident because the AI system's use led to the creation and distribution of child sexual abuse material, a clear violation of human rights and applicable laws. The harm is realized and significant, involving exploitation and abuse of minors, thus meeting the criteria for an AI Incident.

The event involves the use of an AI system to create manipulated video content that constitutes child pornography, which is a serious violation of human rights and legal protections. The AI system's use directly led to harm through the creation and distribution of illegal and harmful content involving minors. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident due to the realized harm and legal violations caused by the AI-generated content.

The article describes a minor accused of sharing a video created using artificial intelligence that depicts another minor. The AI system's use in generating the video directly relates to the harm caused, including violations of personal data laws and child pornography offenses. Since the AI-generated content has led to legal and social harm, this qualifies as an AI Incident.

The event involves the use of an AI system to generate manipulated video content (deepfake) depicting child sexual abuse, which is a clear violation of personal data and child protection laws, causing harm to the victim and their family. The AI system's use directly led to the creation and dissemination of harmful illegal content, qualifying this as an AI Incident under the definitions provided.

The event involves the use of an AI system to create illegal and harmful content (child pornography), which directly violates legal and human rights protections. The harm to the victim and the breach of laws related to child protection and privacy are clear and realized. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident due to the direct involvement of AI in causing harm and legal violations.

The event explicitly involves the use of AI to create a manipulated video constituting child sexual abuse material, which is a severe violation of human rights and personal data protection laws. The AI system's use directly led to harm to the victim and the victim's family, fulfilling the criteria for an AI Incident under violations of human rights and breach of legal protections. The harm is realized, not just potential, and the AI system's role is pivotal in creating the harmful content.

The article explicitly states that the 13-year-old allegedly used AI to create child pornographic material involving another minor, which was then distributed online. This directly involves an AI system's use leading to harm, including violations of personal data laws and harm to the victim. The harm is realized, not just potential, and the AI system's role is pivotal in generating the harmful content. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident under the definitions provided.

The event involves an AI system used to generate child pornography, which is a violation of legal protections and human rights. The AI-generated content directly led to legal action and harm related to child exploitation and privacy violations. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident due to the realized harm involving AI-generated illegal content depicting minors.

The article explicitly states that the pornographic video was created using AI technology, constituting an AI system's use. The video depicts an 11-year-old child in a harmful and illegal manner, causing direct harm to the child's rights and well-being. The distribution of this AI-generated content among minors and the subsequent legal actions confirm that harm has materialized. Therefore, this event meets the criteria for an AI Incident due to the direct involvement of AI in producing harmful content and the resulting violation of rights and legal statutes.

The article explicitly states that the pornographic video was created using AI technology, depicting a minor in a fabricated and harmful manner. This AI-generated content has been distributed, causing direct harm to the child and leading to legal action. The AI system's use in generating illegal and harmful content that violates personal rights and laws concerning minors fits the definition of an AI Incident, as it directly led to harm and legal violations.

The article describes a case where unknown perpetrators used AI to create pornographic content involving a minor, which is a clear violation of human rights and legal protections for children. The AI system's use directly led to harm by producing and distributing manipulated harmful content. The 13-year-old involved denies creating the content but acknowledges possession and distribution, indicating the AI-generated material's circulation. This meets the criteria for an AI Incident due to realized harm involving AI-generated content violating rights and causing harm to the child and community.

The article explicitly states that the pornographic video was created using AI technology, implicating an AI system in the generation of harmful content. The harm is realized as the 11-year-old child is being defamed and victimized through the distribution of this AI-generated pornographic material. The involvement of AI in creating manipulated content that leads to violations of rights and harm to the individual and community fits the definition of an AI Incident. Although the 13-year-old accused denies creation, the AI-generated content's existence and circulation have directly caused harm, fulfilling the criteria for an AI Incident.

The event explicitly mentions the use of AI to create a fake pornographic video involving a minor, which constitutes a violation of personal data and rights, as well as harm to the community. The distribution of this AI-generated content has already occurred, causing real harm. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident because the AI system's use directly led to significant harm, including legal violations and reputational damage.