Fraudsters Jailed for AI-Based Cryptocurrency Investment Scam in South Korea

Thumbnail Image

The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.

A group led by a 61-year-old man was sentenced to prison in South Korea for defrauding investors of 19 billion KRW by falsely claiming to use AI-powered computers for cryptocurrency trading. The AI system was non-existent, and the scam caused significant financial harm to numerous victims between 2017 and 2019.[AI generated]

Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?

The event involves the use of AI as a claimed tool in the fraudulent scheme, but the AI system was non-existent or non-functional. The harm (financial loss to investors) has already occurred due to the fraudulent use of the AI claim. Since the AI system's development or use was central to the deception causing harm, this qualifies as an AI Incident under the definition of harm caused by the use of an AI system (even if falsely claimed) leading to violation of property rights and financial harm to people.[AI generated]
AI principles
AccountabilityTransparency & explainability

Industries
Financial and insurance services

Affected stakeholders
Consumers

Harm types
Economic/Property

Severity
AI incident


Articles about this incident or hazard

Thumbnail Image

"AI로 투자하면 큰 돈 번다"...시세차익거래 사기로 190억원 챙긴 일당 징역형

2026-01-17
문화일보
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves the use of AI as a claimed tool in the fraudulent scheme, but the AI system was non-existent or non-functional. The harm (financial loss to investors) has already occurred due to the fraudulent use of the AI claim. Since the AI system's development or use was central to the deception causing harm, this qualifies as an AI Incident under the definition of harm caused by the use of an AI system (even if falsely claimed) leading to violation of property rights and financial harm to people.
Thumbnail Image

"AI로 가상화폐 수익"...190억원 뜯은 일당 항소심도 징역형

2026-01-17
연합뉴스TV
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
An AI system is explicitly mentioned as part of the fraudulent scheme, although it was falsely represented and did not function as claimed. The use of AI in this context was part of the deception leading to significant financial harm to investors. Since the AI system's involvement (even if fraudulent and non-functional) directly contributed to the harm (financial loss), this qualifies as an AI Incident under the definition of harm caused by the use (misuse) of an AI system.
Thumbnail Image

''AI로 가상화폐 수익 낸다''...2천800여 차례 190억원 갈취한 일당 징역형

2026-01-17
매일방송
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves the use of AI as a false claim to induce investment fraud, leading to direct financial harm to many investors. Although the AI system was not genuinely used or malfunctioning, the development and use of AI claims were central to the fraudulent scheme causing harm. This fits the definition of an AI Incident because the AI system's (albeit fraudulent) involvement directly led to significant harm (financial loss) to people.
Thumbnail Image

AI가 돈 벌어준다" 190억 가상자산 사기...항소심서도 징역형 - 시사저널

2026-01-17
시사저널
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
An AI system is explicitly mentioned as part of the fraudulent claim (AI automatic trading), which was used to lure investors. Although the AI system did not actually function as described, the misuse of AI claims directly led to significant financial harm (harm to property) to many people. This constitutes an AI Incident because the development or use of an AI system (or its claimed use) directly led to harm through deception and fraud.
Thumbnail Image

"AI로 가상화폐 수익"...190억대 사기 일당, 2심도 징역형

2026-01-17
데일리안
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event describes a criminal case where the defendants falsely claimed to use AI for cryptocurrency trading to attract investments, which led to a large-scale financial fraud causing harm to many victims. The AI system's role is pivotal as the scam was based on the purported AI capabilities, which were non-existent. This meets the definition of an AI Incident because the development and use of an AI system (or the claim thereof) directly led to harm (financial loss) to persons. The harm is realized and significant, and the AI involvement is central to the incident.