
The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
A group led by a 61-year-old man was sentenced to prison in South Korea for defrauding investors of 19 billion KRW by falsely claiming to use AI-powered computers for cryptocurrency trading. The AI system was non-existent, and the scam caused significant financial harm to numerous victims between 2017 and 2019.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves the use of AI as a claimed tool in the fraudulent scheme, but the AI system was non-existent or non-functional. The harm (financial loss to investors) has already occurred due to the fraudulent use of the AI claim. Since the AI system's development or use was central to the deception causing harm, this qualifies as an AI Incident under the definition of harm caused by the use of an AI system (even if falsely claimed) leading to violation of property rights and financial harm to people.[AI generated]