:strip_icc():format(jpeg)/kly-media-production/medias/4731330/original/087268000_1706698285-fotor-ai-2024013117501.jpg)
The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
Multiple reports from Akamai warn that by 2026, cyberattacks in the Asia Pacific region will be increasingly automated and accelerated by AI, outpacing traditional human-led defenses. AI systems will enable attackers to autonomously scan, exploit, and adapt attacks in real time, raising significant cybersecurity risks for organizations.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly mentions autonomous AI systems used by hackers to perform rapid, large-scale cyberattacks, which could plausibly lead to harm such as disruption of critical infrastructure and damage to digital trust and communities. Although no actual harm has yet occurred, the credible forecast and expert warnings about the capabilities and speed of these AI systems establish a plausible risk scenario. This fits the definition of an AI Hazard, as the development and use of such AI systems could plausibly lead to an AI Incident in the future. There is no indication of a current realized harm or incident, nor is the article primarily about responses or complementary information, so AI Hazard is the appropriate classification.[AI generated]