The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
In Augsburg, Germany, a car dealer used an AI-generated image showing a car in flames to falsely claim that pre-existing damages caused a fire, demanding a refund from the seller. The seller discovered the undamaged car for sale online. Police are investigating the dealer for attempted fraud involving AI deception.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
An AI system was explicitly used to generate a fake image to deceive a customer, which is a misuse of AI leading to an attempted fraud. The harm here is a violation of legal and property rights through deception. The AI-generated image was pivotal in the fraudulent attempt, making this an AI Incident rather than a hazard or complementary information. The police investigation for attempted fraud confirms the harm is realized or at least directly attempted.[AI generated]