Actors and Voice Artists Protest Unauthorized AI Voice and Image Use

Thumbnail Image

The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.

Actors and voice artists, including Hong Kong dubbing professionals and Oscar-winner Matthew McConaughey, are protesting the unauthorized use of their voices and images by AI systems. They argue that AI-generated voice and image synthesis infringes on intellectual property and labor rights, threatening their livelihoods and creative autonomy.[AI generated]

Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?

The article explicitly mentions AI-generated voice synthesis using unauthorized voice samples of professional voice actors, which infringes on their rights and harms their livelihood. This is a direct violation of intellectual property and labor rights, fitting the definition of an AI Incident under violations of human rights or breach of obligations protecting labor and intellectual property rights. The AI system's use (unauthorized training and generation) directly leads to harm, justifying classification as an AI Incident.[AI generated]
AI principles
AccountabilityRespect of human rights

Industries
Arts, entertainment, and recreation

Affected stakeholders
Workers

Harm types
Economic/PropertyHuman or fundamental rights

Severity
AI incident

AI system task:
Content generation


Articles about this incident or hazard

Thumbnail Image

別搶我飯碗!《哆啦A夢》《海綿寶寶》配音員 聯合抵制AI「盜聲」侵權

2026-02-24
自由時報電子報
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly mentions AI-generated voice synthesis using unauthorized voice samples of professional voice actors, which infringes on their rights and harms their livelihood. This is a direct violation of intellectual property and labor rights, fitting the definition of an AI Incident under violations of human rights or breach of obligations protecting labor and intellectual property rights. The AI system's use (unauthorized training and generation) directly leads to harm, justifying classification as an AI Incident.
Thumbnail Image

AI侵蝕演員生計|奧斯卡影帝馬修麥康納 促演員保護聲音形象 - EJ Tech

2026-02-23
EJ Tech
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The involvement of AI systems is explicit, particularly AI voice generation and image synthesis technologies. The harms described include violations of intellectual property and labor rights, as actors' voices and images are used without proper consent or compensation. The article reports ongoing and realized impacts, not just potential risks, thus constituting an AI Incident. The direct link between AI use and harm to actors' rights and livelihoods fits the definition of an AI Incident under violations of human rights and labor rights.
Thumbnail Image

AI生成音樂引侵犯著作權疑慮 生成迅速部分甚至入排行榜

2026-02-26
公共電視
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The AI music generation platform uses AI systems to create music based on text prompts and audio inputs. The article reports that this AI-generated music has led to lawsuits from major record companies alleging copyright infringement, which is a violation of intellectual property rights. This harm is realized and ongoing, as the article mentions legal disputes and concerns from music creators about their rights being infringed. Therefore, the event involves an AI system whose use has directly led to a breach of intellectual property rights, fitting the definition of an AI Incident.