Man Uses AI to Forge Medical Documents for Restaurant Extortion in Shanghai

Thumbnail Image

The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.

A man in Shanghai used AI software to forge medical documents and images, falsely claiming food poisoning to extort compensation from multiple restaurants. He successfully defrauded two businesses, gaining 2,500 yuan, before being arrested by police. The AI-generated forgeries were central to the fraudulent scheme.[AI generated]

Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?

The use of AI to forge medical documents directly led to fraudulent compensation claims, causing financial harm to multiple restaurants. The AI system's role in generating fake images and documents was pivotal in enabling the crime. This fits the definition of an AI Incident because the AI system's use directly led to harm (financial loss and legal violations).[AI generated]
AI principles
Robustness & digital securityTransparency & explainability
Industries
Food and beverages
Affected stakeholders
Business
Harm types
Economic/Property
Severity
AI incident
AI system task:
Content generation

Articles about this incident or hazard

Thumbnail Image

男子用AI伪造呕吐物向多家餐厅索赔

2026-02-25
k.sina.com.cn
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The use of AI to forge medical documents directly led to fraudulent compensation claims, causing financial harm to multiple restaurants. The AI system's role in generating fake images and documents was pivotal in enabling the crime. This fits the definition of an AI Incident because the AI system's use directly led to harm (financial loss and legal violations).
Thumbnail Image

2026-02-25
bjnews.com.cn
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event explicitly involves the use of an AI system to create forged medical documents that were used to extort money, causing direct harm (financial loss) to the victims. The AI system's development and use directly led to the harm, fulfilling the criteria for an AI Incident. The harm is realized and not merely potential, and the AI system's role is pivotal in enabling the fraudulent scheme.
Thumbnail Image

男子假装吃坏肚子并用AI伪造证明 向多家餐厅恶意索赔被抓

2026-02-25
驱动之家
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event explicitly mentions the use of AI software to fabricate medical documents, which directly led to the harm of fraudulent extortion from restaurants. The AI system's use was pivotal in enabling the forgery and subsequent malicious claims, constituting an AI Incident as the harm has materialized and is directly linked to the AI system's misuse.
Thumbnail Image

男子假装吃坏肚子，用AI伪造病历与发票敲诈餐馆被抓

2026-02-25
凤凰网（凤凰新媒体）
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event explicitly mentions the use of AI software to generate falsified medical documents, which were then used to extort money from businesses. This constitutes direct harm (financial loss) caused by the malicious use of an AI system. Therefore, it meets the criteria of an AI Incident because the AI system's use directly led to harm (fraud and extortion).
Thumbnail Image

男子用AI伪造就诊记录向餐厅索赔，涉嫌敲诈勒索

2026-02-26
扬子网（扬子晚报）
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event explicitly mentions the use of AI software to manipulate and forge medical documents, which is an AI system involvement. The forged documents were used to extort money from the restaurant, constituting a realized harm (financial loss and criminal extortion). Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident because the AI system's use directly led to harm and legal violations.
Thumbnail Image

男子用AI伪造病历向餐厅恶意索赔被抓 科技作恶终落法网

2026-02-25
中华网科技公司
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The use of AI software to fabricate medical documents is explicitly mentioned, indicating AI system involvement. The forged documents were used to extort money from the restaurant, causing direct financial harm and legal violations. The incident involves the malicious use of AI-generated content to commit fraud and extortion, which fits the definition of an AI Incident due to realized harm (financial loss and legal violations) directly linked to AI misuse.
Thumbnail Image

男子用AI伪造病历敲诈多家餐厅

2026-02-25
k.sina.com.cn
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves the use of an AI system to create fake medical records and documents, which directly led to harm in the form of fraudulent financial gain and legal violations. The AI system's use in forging documents is central to the incident, causing harm to businesses and violating legal norms. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident due to the realized harm caused by the AI system's misuse.
Thumbnail Image

男子假装"吃坏肚子"并用AI伪造证明，向多家餐厅恶意索赔被抓

2026-02-25
k.sina.com.cn
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event explicitly states the use of AI software to generate forged medical and billing documents, which were then used to extort money from restaurants. The AI system's use directly led to harm (financial loss and legal disruption) to the victims. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident because the AI system's use was pivotal in causing realized harm through fraudulent activity and legal violations.
Thumbnail Image

男子利用 AI 伪造"吃坏肚子"医院诊断证明敲诈商家，非法获利 2500 元被采取刑事强制措施

2026-02-25
新浪财经
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves the use of an AI system to create forged medical documents that were used to extort money from businesses. This directly caused harm to the businesses (financial loss) and involved illegal activity (fraud and extortion). The AI system's role in generating the fake documents is central to the incident, fulfilling the criteria for an AI Incident as the AI system's use directly led to harm. Therefore, this event qualifies as an AI Incident.
Thumbnail Image

男子假装"吃坏肚子"并用AI伪造证明，向多家餐厅恶意索赔

2026-02-25
新浪财经
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event explicitly mentions the use of AI software to falsify medical documents and related materials, which were then used to extort money from restaurants. This constitutes direct involvement of an AI system in causing harm (financial loss) through malicious use. The harm is realized and not just potential, meeting the criteria for an AI Incident. The AI system's role is pivotal in enabling the forgery and subsequent extortion, thus this is classified as an AI Incident.
Thumbnail Image

男子用AI伪造就诊记录向餐厅索赔，涉嫌敲诈勒索

2026-02-26
k.sina.com.cn
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event explicitly states that AI software was used to manipulate and forge medical documents, which were then used to extort money from restaurants. This misuse of AI directly led to realized harm in the form of fraudulent financial compensation and legal violations. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident because the AI system's use directly caused harm through criminal extortion.
Thumbnail Image

上海一男子假装"吃坏肚子"并用AI伪造证明，向多家餐厅恶意索赔

2026-02-26
新浪财经
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event explicitly states that the suspect used AI software to forge medical documents, which directly led to fraudulent compensation claims and financial harm to restaurants. The AI system's use was pivotal in enabling the creation of convincing fake evidence, facilitating the extortion scheme. The harm is realized and involves violation of legal rights and financial harm, fitting the definition of an AI Incident rather than a hazard or complementary information.