AI軍事利用巡るアンソロピックとの裁判で、米政権が控訴 続く係争：朝日新聞
2026-04-02
朝日新聞デジタル
The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
US AI company Anthropic accused Chinese firms of illegally extracting capabilities from its Claude model using mass account networks, violating terms and raising security concerns. Separately, Anthropic accidentally leaked 500,000 lines of Claude Code's source code due to a packaging error, exposing proprietary technology and internal plans.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly mentions an AI system ('Claude' by Anthropic) and concerns about its military use, which relates to national security risks. The government's exclusion and the court injunction are responses to these concerns. Since no actual harm or incident caused by the AI system is reported, and the focus is on legal and governance actions regarding potential risks, this event fits the definition of an AI Hazard. It plausibly could lead to harm related to national security if the AI system were misused or its supply chain risks realized, but no harm has occurred yet.[AI generated]