
The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
Brazil's competition authority, Cade, upheld a daily fine against Meta for allegedly abusing its dominant position by favoring its own AI chatbots on WhatsApp and excluding competitors. The investigation followed complaints from rival chatbot companies, Luzia and Zapia, citing harm to market competition.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves the use of AI chatbots on WhatsApp, an AI system, and concerns the development and use of these AI systems by Meta. The harm is linked to anti-competitive practices (abuse of dominant position) that affect competitors and market fairness, which is a violation of legal frameworks protecting competition and rights. The fine and investigation show that harm is occurring or has occurred, not just a potential risk. Hence, this qualifies as an AI Incident under the definition of violations of applicable law and harm to communities (market competition).[AI generated]