Delhi High Court Orders Removal of AI-Generated Deepfakes Exploiting Aman Gupta

Thumbnail Image

The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.

The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction protecting entrepreneur Aman Gupta from unauthorized use of his identity, including AI-generated deepfakes, chatbots, and fake endorsements. Multiple online platforms and entities were ordered to remove infringing content, citing reputational harm and violation of personality and trademark rights. The incident occurred in India.[AI generated]

Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?

The article explicitly mentions the creation and distribution of sexually explicit AI deepfake videos exploiting Aman Gupta's persona, which constitutes a violation of his personality rights and trademarks. The AI system's use in generating deepfakes directly led to reputational harm and unauthorized commercial exploitation, fulfilling the criteria for an AI Incident. The court's injunction is a response to this realized harm, not merely a potential risk or complementary information.[AI generated]
AI principles
Respect of human rightsPrivacy & data governance
Industries
Media, social platforms, and marketing
Affected stakeholders
General public
Harm types
ReputationalHuman or fundamental rights
Severity
AI incident
AI system task:
Content generationInteraction support/chatbots

Articles about this incident or hazard

Thumbnail Image

Delhi High Court protects personality rights of boAt's Aman Gupta from 'sexually explicit' AI deepfakes

2026-05-11
The Indian Express
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly mentions the creation and distribution of sexually explicit AI deepfake videos exploiting Aman Gupta's persona, which constitutes a violation of his personality rights and trademarks. The AI system's use in generating deepfakes directly led to reputational harm and unauthorized commercial exploitation, fulfilling the criteria for an AI Incident. The court's injunction is a response to this realized harm, not merely a potential risk or complementary information.
Thumbnail Image

Delhi HC protects personality rights of boAt's Aman Gupta

2026-05-11
The Hindu
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event explicitly involves AI-generated content (deepfake technology) being used without authorization to impersonate Aman Gupta, causing harm to his personality rights and potentially leading to reputational and emotional harm. The court's intervention to restrain such misuse indicates that harm has occurred or is ongoing due to the AI system's use. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident because the development and use of AI systems (deepfake generation) have directly led to violations of rights and harm to the individual.
Thumbnail Image

Delhi High Court grants interim personality rights protection to Aman Gupta against unauthorized digital misuse

2026-05-11
FoneArena
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
While the article references AI-driven content generation and impersonation risks as part of the rationale for the court's injunction, it does not describe any realized harm or incident caused by an AI system. The injunction is a preventive legal measure addressing potential misuse, and the main focus is on the court's order and the legal protection of personality rights. Therefore, this event is best classified as Complementary Information, as it provides important context on societal and governance responses to AI-related risks without describing a new AI Incident or AI Hazard.
Thumbnail Image

Delhi HC orders takedown of deepfakes, fake endorsements and objectionable content in Aman Gupta's personality rights case

2026-05-10
Asian News International (ANI)
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly mentions AI-generated deepfakes and objectionable content that infringe on Aman Gupta's personality rights, causing reputational harm and unauthorized commercial exploitation. The AI system's use (deepfake generation) has directly led to harm, fulfilling the criteria for an AI Incident. The court's intervention and takedown orders confirm that harm has materialized, not just a potential risk.
Thumbnail Image

Delhi High Court grants interim protection to Aman Gupta over personality rights misuse

2026-05-10
Telangana Today
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly mentions AI-generated deepfake content used to impersonate Aman Gupta, which is a misuse of his personality rights and trademarks. The court's intervention to remove such content and restrain impersonation indicates that harm has already occurred. The AI system's role in generating deepfake videos and content is pivotal to the incident, as it directly leads to violations of personality rights and potential reputational harm. Hence, this event meets the criteria for an AI Incident involving violations of rights and harm caused by AI misuse.
Thumbnail Image

India News | Delhi HC Orders Takedown of Deepfakes, Fake Endorsements and Objectionable Content in Aman Gupta's Personality Rights Case | LatestLY

2026-05-10
LatestLY
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly mentions AI-generated deepfakes and objectionable content that infringe on Aman Gupta's personality rights, including unauthorized use of his name, image, voice, and likeness. The harm is realized as reputational damage and violation of rights, and the court's intervention confirms the direct involvement of AI systems in causing this harm. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident due to the direct harm caused by the use of AI systems (deepfake technology) in producing unauthorized and harmful content.
Thumbnail Image

Delhi HC grants interim relief to Aman Gupta in personality rights suit

2026-05-10
Social News XYZ
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly mentions AI-generated deepfake content and AI-based chatbot impersonation as part of the unauthorized exploitation of Aman Gupta's personality. The misuse of AI to create sexually explicit and misleading content directly harms Gupta's personality rights and reputation, which is a violation of fundamental rights. Since the harm is occurring and the court has intervened to prevent further damage, this qualifies as an AI Incident due to realized harm caused by AI system misuse.
Thumbnail Image

Delhi HC Protects Aman Gupta From AI Deepfakes, Fake Profiles

2026-05-11
MediaNama
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event explicitly involves AI systems generating deepfake and chatbot content that impersonates Aman Gupta without authorization, leading to violations of his personality and trademark rights, as well as the spread of obscene material. The court's intervention to prevent further misuse confirms that harm has occurred and is ongoing. The AI systems' use directly caused these harms, fulfilling the criteria for an AI Incident under the framework. The case is not merely a potential risk or a complementary update but a concrete instance of AI misuse causing harm.
Thumbnail Image

Shark Tank's Aman Gupta gets court order against misuse of his image

2026-05-10
Asianet News Network Pvt Ltd
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves AI-generated deepfake content that has been used without authorization, causing harm to Aman Gupta's personality rights and reputation. The misuse of AI to create fake endorsements and pornographic deepfakes constitutes a violation of rights and harm to the individual. Since the harm has already occurred and the court is intervening to stop ongoing misuse, this qualifies as an AI Incident due to realized harm caused by AI system use (deepfake generation).
Thumbnail Image

Delhi HC Orders Deepfake Takedown for Aman Gupta

2026-05-10
newKerala.com
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event explicitly mentions AI-generated deepfakes being used without authorization, causing reputational harm and potential unlawful financial gains. The misuse of AI deepfake technology to create fake endorsements and pornographic content constitutes a violation of personality rights and intellectual property rights. Since the harm (reputational damage, violation of rights) is occurring due to the AI system's use, this qualifies as an AI Incident under the framework.
Thumbnail Image

Delhi HC protects entrepreneur Aman Gupta's personality rights

2026-05-11
NewsDrum
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event explicitly involves AI-generated content and AI-based chatbots used to impersonate Aman Gupta without authorization, which is a misuse of AI systems leading to violation of personality rights, a form of human rights violation. The court's intervention is in response to actual misuse causing harm to Gupta's rights. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident because the AI system's use has directly led to harm (violation of personality and publicity rights).
Thumbnail Image

Boat Founder Aman Gupta Secures Interim Personality Rights Protection From Delhi High Court - BW Disrupt

2026-05-11
BW Disrupt
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly mentions AI-generated impersonations and deepfake content as part of the unauthorized misuse of Aman Gupta's identity, which has led to reputational harm and legal action. The AI system's misuse directly caused harm to the individual's rights and reputation, fitting the definition of an AI Incident. The court's intervention and injunction confirm that harm has occurred, not just a potential risk, distinguishing this from an AI Hazard or Complementary Information.