Legal Action Over Unauthorized Commercial Use of AI-Generated Images of Footballer Szoboszlai Dominik

Thumbnail Image

The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.

Several companies used AI-generated images based on footballer Szoboszlai Dominik's viral outfit for commercial purposes without his consent. His management has initiated legal action, citing violations of personality and intellectual property rights. The incident highlights the misuse of AI in creating unauthorized promotional content. The events occurred in Hungary.[AI generated]

Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?

An AI system was explicitly involved in generating images used commercially without authorization, which constitutes a violation of intellectual property and personality rights. This misuse has led to legal action, indicating realized harm related to rights violations. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident under the category of violations of human rights or breach of obligations under applicable law protecting intellectual property rights.[AI generated]
AI principles
Respect of human rightsAccountability

Industries
Media, social platforms, and marketing

Affected stakeholders
Other

Harm types
Human or fundamental rightsEconomic/Property

Severity
AI incident

Business function:
Marketing and advertisement

AI system task:
Content generation


Articles about this incident or hazard

Thumbnail Image

Ügyvédhez fordult Szoboszlai Dominik menedzsmentje az öltözéke ihlette reklámkampányok miatt

2026-06-04
Index.hu
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
An AI system was explicitly involved in generating images used commercially without authorization, which constitutes a violation of intellectual property and personality rights. This misuse has led to legal action, indicating realized harm related to rights violations. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident under the category of violations of human rights or breach of obligations under applicable law protecting intellectual property rights.
Thumbnail Image

Szoboszlaiék jogi ügyet csinálnak a focista outfitjét használó céges hirdetésfotók miatt

2026-06-04
444
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The use of AI-generated images based on Szoboszlai's photos for commercial purposes without consent constitutes a violation of intellectual property rights. The involvement of AI in generating these images directly contributes to the harm. Since legal action has been initiated due to this unauthorized use, this qualifies as an AI Incident under the category of violations of intellectual property rights.
Thumbnail Image

Perre készül Szoboszlai Dominik menedzsmentje: a futótűzként terjedő fotójáról van szó

2026-06-04
nlc
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly mentions AI-generated images used commercially without authorization, which infringes on the footballer's rights. The management's legal response indicates that harm in the form of rights violations has occurred due to the AI system's use. Since the AI system's development and use directly led to a breach of intellectual property and personality rights, this fits the definition of an AI Incident under violations of human rights or breach of legal obligations protecting intellectual property rights.
Thumbnail Image

Szoboszlai Dominik menedzsmentje pereket indít a viccelődések miatt

2026-06-04
infostart.hu
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly mentions AI-generated images of Szoboszlai Dominik being used commercially without permission, which is a breach of rights and could lead to legal consequences. The AI system's role is in generating these images, and the misuse is by third parties using them for business promotion. Since no actual harm (such as a court ruling or damages awarded) is reported yet, but legal actions are underway and the risk of rights violations is clear, this fits the definition of an AI Hazard rather than an AI Incident. The event involves AI system use and plausible future harm through rights violations and unauthorized commercial exploitation.
Thumbnail Image

Nem éri meg szórakozni Szoboszlai fotójával: jogi lépések várhatók

2026-06-05
ATV.hu
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly mentions AI-generated images derived from original photos being used commercially without permission, leading to legal actions. The AI system's outputs (generated images) are directly involved in causing harm to the individual's personality rights and legal protections. The harm is realized, not just potential, as legal steps have already been taken. Hence, this qualifies as an AI Incident under violations of human rights and personality rights due to AI misuse.