AI-Generated Image Falsely Links Shakira to Colombian Political Campaign

Thumbnail Image

The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.

An AI-generated image falsely depicting Shakira endorsing Colombian presidential candidate Iván Cepeda and his running mate Aída Quilcué circulated on social media. Shakira publicly denied any political support and condemned the unauthorized use of her image, leading to the removal of the manipulated content. The incident highlights AI-driven misinformation risks.[AI generated]

Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?

An AI system was used to generate an image falsely depicting Shakira endorsing a political candidate, which she explicitly denied. This misuse of AI-generated content can cause harm to the individual's reputation and mislead the public, constituting harm to communities through misinformation. Since the AI-generated image has already circulated and caused a public reaction, this is a realized harm linked directly to the AI system's use, qualifying as an AI Incident.[AI generated]
AI principles
Transparency & explainabilityDemocracy & human autonomy

Industries
Media, social platforms, and marketing

Affected stakeholders
OtherGeneral public

Harm types
ReputationalPublic interest

Severity
AI incident

AI system task:
Content generation


Articles about this incident or hazard

Thumbnail Image

Shakira desautoriza uso de su imagen en campaña presidencial de Iván Cepeda

2026-06-05
Diario del Norte
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
An AI system was used to generate an image falsely depicting Shakira endorsing a political candidate, which she explicitly denied. This misuse of AI-generated content can cause harm to the individual's reputation and mislead the public, constituting harm to communities through misinformation. Since the AI-generated image has already circulated and caused a public reaction, this is a realized harm linked directly to the AI system's use, qualifying as an AI Incident.
Thumbnail Image

Shakira denuncia en un comunicado a ¡HOLA! el uso de su imagen: "Las imágenes que circulan de mí apoyando a candidatos presidenciales son falsas"

2026-06-05
es-us.vida-estilo.yahoo.com
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves the use of AI-generated manipulated images (deepfakes or photomontages) that falsely represent a public figure endorsing political candidates, which constitutes misinformation harming the community and potentially violating rights related to free and fair elections. Since the AI system's use has directly led to the dissemination of false information with social harm, this qualifies as an AI Incident under the framework.
Thumbnail Image

Shakira denuncia el uso de su imagen sin consentimiento como apoyo a un partido político colombiano

2026-06-05
MARCA
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event explicitly mentions the use of an AI-generated image (an AI system) to create a false depiction of Shakira supporting a political party without her consent. This unauthorized use of her image constitutes a violation of her rights, fulfilling the criteria for harm under (c) violations of human rights or breach of obligations protecting fundamental rights. The harm has already occurred as the image was publicly disseminated and led to a public dispute and removal of the content. Therefore, this is an AI Incident rather than a hazard or complementary information.
Thumbnail Image

Shakira denuncia el uso de su imagen y su nombre en las elecciones de Colombia: "No respaldo a ningún candidato"

2026-06-05
elEconomista.es
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
An AI system was used to generate a fake image of Shakira with political candidates, which was then disseminated in an election campaign without her consent. This constitutes a violation of her rights, fulfilling the criteria for an AI Incident under violations of human rights or breach of obligations protecting fundamental rights. The harm is realized as the unauthorized use and potential misleading of the public. The event is not merely a potential risk but an actual occurrence of harm caused by AI-generated content.
Thumbnail Image

Shakira rechaza el uso de su imagen en campañas políticas en Colombia

2026-06-06
Teleamazonas
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
An AI system (generative AI) was used to create manipulated images falsely linking Shakira to political candidates, constituting misuse of AI-generated content. Although the images were removed and no direct harm is reported, the event involves misinformation that could harm communities or individuals' reputations if it had spread further. Since the harm is indirect and the images were taken down promptly, this qualifies as an AI Incident due to the realized misinformation harm and violation of rights (false endorsement).