AI Misidentification of Mushroom Leads to User Poisoning in China

Thumbnail Image

The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.

A user in China relied on the Douyin Group's AI tool 'Doubao' to identify wild mushrooms, resulting in misidentification and consumption of a toxic mushroom. Despite explicit warnings from the AI, the user suffered acute kidney failure. The incident highlights risks of overreliance on AI in safety-critical situations.[AI generated]

Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?

The AI system was used in a safety-critical context (wild mushroom identification) and its output directly influenced a user's harmful action (consuming a poisonous mushroom). The harm (acute kidney failure) is a serious injury to health caused indirectly by the AI system's use. Although the AI provided warnings, the user's blind trust and reliance on the AI led to the harm. This fits the definition of an AI Incident because the AI system's use directly or indirectly led to injury or harm to a person. The event is not merely a hazard or complementary information, as the harm has already occurred.[AI generated]
AI principles
SafetyRobustness & digital security

Industries
Consumer servicesFood and beverages

Affected stakeholders
Consumers

Harm types
Physical (injury)

Severity
AI incident

Business function:
Citizen/customer service

AI system task:
Recognition/object detection


Articles about this incident or hazard

Thumbnail Image

网民无视警告照盲信AI食毒菇 抖音副总裁:AI仅供参考 - 国际 - 国际拼盘

2026-06-06
星洲日报
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The AI system was used in a safety-critical context (wild mushroom identification) and its output directly influenced a user's harmful action (consuming a poisonous mushroom). The harm (acute kidney failure) is a serious injury to health caused indirectly by the AI system's use. Although the AI provided warnings, the user's blind trust and reliance on the AI led to the harm. This fits the definition of an AI Incident because the AI system's use directly or indirectly led to injury or harm to a person. The event is not merely a hazard or complementary information, as the harm has already occurred.
Thumbnail Image

抖音副总裁李亮回应"豆包误判蘑菇致用户中毒" -- 新京报

2026-06-06
bjnews.com.cn
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The AI system '豆包' was used to identify mushrooms, and its misclassification contributed to a user consuming a toxic mushroom, causing poisoning. This constitutes injury or harm to a person's health caused directly or indirectly by the AI system's use. Although the system included warnings, the misidentification and reliance on the AI output led to harm. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident under the definition of harm to health caused by AI system use.
Thumbnail Image

"豆包误判蘑菇致用户中毒",回应来了_YNET.com北青网

2026-06-06
北青网
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The AI system ('豆包') was used to identify wild mushrooms, and its misclassification led to a user consuming poisonous mushrooms, resulting in poisoning. This constitutes harm to a person's health caused indirectly by the AI system's use. The AI system's involvement in the incident is explicit, and the harm is realized. Therefore, this event qualifies as an AI Incident under the definition of injury or harm to a person's health caused directly or indirectly by the use of an AI system.
Thumbnail Image

堅信豆包誤食毒菇「急性腎衰竭」 官方強調:AI答案僅供參考

2026-06-05
ETtoday AI科技
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The AI system '豆包' was used to identify mushrooms, a task involving AI-based image recognition and classification. Although the AI included disclaimers about possible errors and risks, the user relied on the AI's output to consume a mushroom that was actually toxic, causing acute kidney failure. This is a direct harm to health caused indirectly by the AI system's use and the user's overreliance on it. Therefore, this event meets the criteria for an AI Incident as it involves injury to a person resulting from the use of an AI system.
Thumbnail Image

抖音豆包蘑菇识别存误判风险,官方强调不可替代专业鉴定

2026-06-06
ai.zol.com.cn
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
An AI system is involved as the mushroom identification relies on image recognition AI. The event involves the use of the AI system and highlights a risk of harm to health due to misidentification leading to potential poisoning. Although no specific harm is reported as having occurred, the risk of harm (misidentification causing poisoning) is clearly stated and plausible. Therefore, this constitutes an AI Hazard because the AI system's use could plausibly lead to injury or harm to health, but no actual incident of harm is described.
Thumbnail Image

AI辨識蘑菇失準 用戶無視警告誤食中毒 抖音副總裁強調AI僅供參考 - 星島日報

2026-06-06
星島日報
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
An AI system (the mushroom identification tool) was used and provided an output with an explicit warning about the risk of misidentification. The user relied on the AI's output but ignored the warning, leading to serious health harm (acute kidney failure). This constitutes an AI Incident because the AI system's use directly contributed to the harm, even though the system included warnings. The event meets the criteria for an AI Incident as it involves injury to a person caused indirectly by the AI system's use and its limitations in safety-critical applications.