AI-Generated Deepfake Video Targets Nigerian Military Leadership

Thumbnail Image

The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.

An AI-generated deepfake video falsely depicting Nigeria's Chief of Defence Staff and Chief of Army Staff circulated on social media, misleading the public and undermining trust in the military. The Defence Headquarters confirmed the video was digitally manipulated and urged the public to disregard it, warning of potential national security risks.[AI generated]

Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?

The video is an AI-generated manipulated content (deepfake) falsely portraying military leaders, which is a misuse of AI technology. Although the video is circulating, the military denies any official communication and warns against misinformation. There is concern about potential harm to public confidence and national security, but no direct or indirect harm has occurred yet. Therefore, this event represents a plausible future risk of harm due to AI misuse, qualifying it as an AI Hazard rather than an AI Incident. It is not merely complementary information because the main focus is on the fabricated AI content and its potential to cause harm, not on responses or updates to a past incident.[AI generated]
AI principles
Transparency & explainabilityAccountability

Industries
Media, social platforms, and marketingGovernment, security, and defence

Affected stakeholders
GovernmentGeneral public

Harm types
ReputationalPublic interest

Severity
AI hazard

AI system task:
Content generation


Articles about this incident or hazard

Thumbnail Image

Military dismisses fake AI video of CDS, Army chief

2026-06-09
Punch Newspapers
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The video is an AI-generated manipulated content (deepfake) falsely portraying military leaders, which is a misuse of AI technology. Although the video is circulating, the military denies any official communication and warns against misinformation. There is concern about potential harm to public confidence and national security, but no direct or indirect harm has occurred yet. Therefore, this event represents a plausible future risk of harm due to AI misuse, qualifying it as an AI Hazard rather than an AI Incident. It is not merely complementary information because the main focus is on the fabricated AI content and its potential to cause harm, not on responses or updates to a past incident.
Thumbnail Image

Defence HQ debunks AI-generated video of Gwabin

2026-06-09
The Guardian
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly mentions AI technologies likely used to generate the fake video, indicating AI system involvement. The misuse of AI to create deceptive content targeting military leadership poses a credible risk of misinformation and harm to communities and national security, fitting the definition of an AI Hazard. Since no actual harm or incident has been reported yet, and the focus is on the potential for harm and ongoing monitoring, it does not meet the threshold for an AI Incident. It is not merely complementary information because the main focus is on the fabricated AI-generated content and its risks, not on responses or broader ecosystem updates.
Thumbnail Image

Military warns public against AI-generated video targeting defence leadership

2026-06-09
THE AUTHORITY NEWS
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves an AI system in the form of AI-generated manipulated video content. The use of AI-generated deepfake video to spread false information about military leadership is a misuse of AI technology that could plausibly lead to harm to communities by undermining public trust and national security. Since the harm is potential and the military is warning about the risks, this qualifies as an AI Hazard rather than an AI Incident, as no actual harm or disruption has been reported yet but the plausible risk is credible and significant.
Thumbnail Image

DHQ Raises Alarm Over AI-Manipulated Video, Clears CDS, COAS of Viral Social Media Clip‎ NewsDiaryOnline

2026-06-09
Newsdiaryonline Nigeria
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event clearly involves an AI system's use in the creation of a manipulated video (deepfake) that has been circulated on social media, constituting misinformation. This misinformation can harm communities by undermining trust in public institutions and potentially affecting national security efforts. Since the AI-manipulated content has already been disseminated and is causing harm through misinformation and confusion, this qualifies as an AI Incident under the definition of harm to communities and potential violation of rights related to truthful information dissemination.
Thumbnail Image

Fake AI video of CDS, Army chief manipulated to mislead Nigerians, says DHQ

2026-06-09
The Sun Nigeria
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The video is explicitly described as digitally manipulated using AI, and it is currently circulating on social media, misleading the public. This constitutes an AI Incident because the AI-generated fake video has directly led to misinformation and potential harm to public trust and national security efforts. The harm is realized and ongoing, not merely potential, fulfilling the criteria for an AI Incident rather than a hazard or complementary information.
Thumbnail Image

Defence Headquarters warns social media influencers against sharing fake military-related content

2026-06-09
TheTimes.com.ng
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly states that the video was fabricated and digitally manipulated using AI, indicating AI system involvement in creating misleading content. The harm described is potential: misinformation that could undermine public confidence and compromise national security efforts. No direct harm or incident is reported as having occurred yet, only a warning and concern about the growing trend. This fits the definition of an AI Hazard, where AI use could plausibly lead to harm but has not yet directly caused it. The military's advisory to avoid amplifying unverified AI-generated content further supports the assessment of a potential future harm scenario rather than a realized incident.
Thumbnail Image

It's Fake AI Video, Says DHQ on CDS Manipulated Footage Circulating on

2026-06-10
BIGPEN NIGERIA
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves an AI system used to create manipulated video content (deepfake) that misrepresents military leadership. This misinformation has already circulated, causing harm by misleading the public and threatening national security, which qualifies as harm to communities and potentially a breach of trust impacting fundamental rights. Therefore, this is an AI Incident due to the realized harm from the AI-generated manipulated content.
Thumbnail Image

'Purveyors of Misinformation Misrepresent CDS as COAS'

2026-06-10
THISDAYLIVE
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves AI-generated manipulated content (videos and images) that misrepresent military officials, which is a misuse of AI technology to spread misinformation. This misinformation could plausibly lead to harm by undermining public confidence and compromising national security efforts. Since the harm is potential and the article focuses on warning and cautioning against this misinformation, it fits the definition of an AI Hazard rather than an AI Incident. There is no indication that the misinformation has directly caused harm yet, only that it could plausibly lead to harm.