South Korean Actress Lee Ji-hye Targeted by Deepfake AI Scam Ads

Thumbnail Image

The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.

South Korean actress Lee Ji-hye was targeted by deepfake AI technology, with her likeness and voice used in fake online ads promoting products like lingerie and sweet potatoes. The ads, created by Chinese entities, misled consumers and violated her rights, prompting her to publicly warn fans against the scam.[AI generated]

Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?

The event explicitly involves AI-generated synthetic media (deepfake videos) that impersonate a real person to promote products fraudulently. This misuse of AI has directly led to harm in the form of reputational damage and consumer deception, which can be considered harm to communities and a violation of personal rights. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident under the framework.[AI generated]
AI principles
Respect of human rightsTransparency & explainability

Industries
Media, social platforms, and marketing

Affected stakeholders
ConsumersWomen

Harm types
Economic/PropertyReputationalHuman or fundamental rights

Severity
AI incident

Business function:
Marketing and advertisement

AI system task:
Content generation


Articles about this incident or hazard

Thumbnail Image

被中國「AI換臉賣內衣」!46歲女星震怒發聲不忍了:不是我

2026-06-19
Yahoo News (Taiwan)
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event explicitly involves AI-generated synthetic media (deepfake videos) that impersonate a real person to promote products fraudulently. This misuse of AI has directly led to harm in the form of reputational damage and consumer deception, which can be considered harm to communities and a violation of personal rights. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident under the framework.
Thumbnail Image

遭AI換臉賣內衣!女星怒駁驚爆「連結導向中國網」

2026-06-18
Yahoo News (Taiwan)
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly mentions the use of AI deepfake technology to create realistic fake videos of a celebrity, which are then used to scam consumers by promoting products falsely. The harm is realized as consumers are misled and the celebrity's image is exploited without consent, constituting violations of rights and harm to communities. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident due to the direct harm caused by the AI system's malicious use.
Thumbnail Image

不是真人!遭中國「AI換臉拍內衣廣告」 李智慧氣炸:我沒拍過

2026-06-18
ETtoday星光雲
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves the use of AI systems for face-swapping to create fake videos that misrepresent individuals, leading to violations of their rights and potential financial harm to consumers who might be deceived by these ads. The AI system's use directly leads to harm in terms of intellectual property and personal rights violations, as well as potential consumer fraud. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident because the AI system's use has directly led to harm through unauthorized synthetic content creation and associated scams.
Thumbnail Image

被中國「AI換臉賣內衣」!46歲女星震怒發聲不忍了:不是我

2026-06-19
三立新聞
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article describes AI-generated deepfake videos that impersonate a real person to promote products fraudulently. The AI system's use directly leads to harm by misleading consumers and violating the actress's rights, fulfilling the criteria for an AI Incident under violations of rights and harm to communities. The harm is realized, not just potential, as consumers have been deceived and some have purchased products based on the fake videos.
Thumbnail Image

遭AI換臉賣內衣!女星氣炸喊:不是我拍的廣告 驚爆「連結導向中國網」 - 民視新聞網

2026-06-18
民視新聞網
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly describes the use of AI deepfake technology to create fake videos of a celebrity, which is a clear AI system involvement. The misuse of this AI system has directly led to harm: reputational damage to the celebrity and potential consumer deception, which can be considered harm to communities and violation of rights. The harm is realized as the fake videos are actively circulating and consumers have already been misled. Hence, this qualifies as an AI Incident rather than a hazard or complementary information.
Thumbnail Image

AI合成太猖狂!李智慧被換臉成內衣、紅薯廣告主角,氣喊:真的滿糟的

2026-06-19
KSD 韓星網
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event explicitly involves AI-generated face swapping (deepfake) technology used to create false advertisements featuring a celebrity's likeness without permission. This misuse directly leads to harm by misleading consumers and violating the individual's rights, including potential reputational damage and fraud risks. Therefore, it meets the criteria of an AI Incident due to the realized harm caused by the AI system's use.