
The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
A U.S. court ordered Meta and Google to pay $6 million in damages after finding that AI-driven features like infinite scroll and autoplay on Instagram and YouTube contributed to youth addiction and mental health harm. Both companies are appealing the Los Angeles verdict, which could influence similar lawsuits.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The social media platforms use AI-driven features (infinite scroll, autoplay) that influence user behavior and have been legally found to cause harm to youth mental health, a recognized harm to a group of people. The involvement of AI systems in causing this harm is explicit in the legal findings. The event is not merely a potential risk but a realized harm adjudicated in court, making it an AI Incident. The ongoing appeals do not change the classification as the harm has already been established at trial.[AI generated]