The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
Ukrainian forces conducted a first-of-its-kind combat mission by using an AI-enabled naval drone to deliver an armed ground robot onto Russian-held Kinburn Spit. The ground robot, remotely operated, fired at targets, demonstrating the direct use of AI systems in active combat and causing harm in a conflict zone.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event explicitly involves AI systems (naval drone and ground robot) used in a military assault, which has directly led to harm through armed engagement. The robotic ground vehicle fired shots at enemy targets, indicating direct involvement in causing harm. The use of AI in this context is not hypothetical or potential but realized in an active combat mission. Hence, it meets the definition of an AI Incident as the AI system's use has directly led to harm to persons in a conflict setting.[AI generated]