Al-altered images on birdwatching forums putting research at risk
2026-07-20
The Guardian
The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
Scientists warn that the use of generative AI tools to edit or create bird photographs is contaminating citizen science databases with false species records. These manipulated images threaten the reliability of biodiversity monitoring and conservation research, as hundreds of fake or altered images have already been identified on major platforms.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly mentions AI systems (generative AI platforms) being used to create or alter images that are then submitted to citizen science platforms, leading to false records of species sightings. This misinformation can disrupt scientific research and conservation efforts, which is a form of harm to communities and the environment. The harm is realized, not just potential, as false sightings have already been documented. Hence, the event meets the criteria for an AI Incident because the AI's use has directly led to harm through misinformation and contamination of scientific data.[AI generated]