The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
Brazilian influencer Karen Bachini sold illustrations as original artwork through a subscription service, but later admitted using AI tools to create or finalize the pieces. Customers and artists identified AI-generated traits, leading to public criticism and Bachini's apology for misleading buyers about the art's authorship.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
An AI system was used to generate or finalize illustrations sold as original art, which were presented as solely the influencer's own creations. This constitutes a violation of intellectual property rights and consumer trust, as the AI's role was not disclosed and the product was misrepresented. The event describes realized harm (deception and rights violation) caused directly by the AI system's use in the artwork creation and sale. Therefore, this qualifies as an AI Incident under the framework, specifically under violations of intellectual property rights and possibly consumer rights.[AI generated]