
The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
Japanese right-wing groups have used AI technology and crowdsourcing platforms to mass-produce falsified videos that distort historical events, such as denying the Nanjing Massacre. Funded by significant government budgets, these AI-generated videos spread misinformation online, misleading the public, especially youth, and threatening historical truth and collective memory.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly states that AI is used to generate large volumes of false historical videos and messages that distort facts about the Nanjing Massacre and Japanese wartime actions. This misinformation is spreading online, affecting public historical knowledge and potentially influencing AI training data, which could perpetuate biased or false outputs. The harms include misinformation, ideological disruption, and violation of rights to accurate historical knowledge, which fits the definition of harm to communities and violation of rights. Since the harm is occurring and linked directly to AI-generated content, this qualifies as an AI Incident.[AI generated]