The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
The Superior Court of Justice of the Canary Islands fined a lawyer €840 for submitting a legal brief containing over 25 fabricated Supreme and Constitutional Court citations generated by an AI system. The court deemed this a serious breach of professional and procedural duties, highlighting the risks of AI hallucinations in legal practice.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event describes a lawyer using fabricated legal citations generated by an AI system, which directly caused harm in the form of professional misconduct and legal sanctions. The AI system malfunctioned by producing false information ('hallucinations'), which the lawyer relied upon, leading to a breach of legal and ethical duties. The harm is realized and directly linked to the AI system's outputs, fulfilling the criteria for an AI Incident under the framework.[AI generated]