
The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
At the 2026 AIDS conference in Brazil, the US State Department used an OpenAI-generated map in a briefing that mislabeled African countries' locations. The error, widely shared online, caused misinformation and reputational harm. The State Department took responsibility, and OpenAI launched an investigation into the incident.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event clearly involves an AI system generating a map with significant factual errors, which was then used in an official presentation. The AI-generated content directly led to misinformation and reputational harm, fulfilling the criteria for harm to communities and possibly violations of trust and diplomatic relations. The US State Department's admission of responsibility and explanation of the error as due to rushed changes further supports that the AI system's malfunction and misuse caused the incident. Hence, this is an AI Incident rather than a hazard or complementary information.[AI generated]