
The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
Taichung City Government used an AI tool to create official housing promotional materials, which mistakenly included Chinese national symbols and elements. The posters were publicly displayed, causing political controversy and public distrust. The city government apologized, removed the materials, and pledged to strengthen review processes to prevent similar AI-related incidents.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves the use of an AI tool to create official promotional content that contained an erroneous and sensitive image, which was then publicly displayed. The AI system's output led to reputational harm and public distrust, which qualifies as harm to communities or a violation of public trust. The housing department's failure in internal review and oversight further implicates the AI system's use in causing this harm. Therefore, this constitutes an AI Incident due to the realized harm stemming from the AI system's use and malfunction in content generation and review processes.[AI generated]