
The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
A study tracking over 25,000 Chinese students aged 12-18 found that using generative AI tools to complete homework led to a significant drop in exam scores—up to 20% lower than peers who did not use AI. The harm was most pronounced in humanities subjects, indicating AI use negatively impacts learning outcomes.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves the use of AI systems (generative AI tools) by students to complete homework assignments. The study shows that this use directly leads to a significant decline in exam performance, indicating harm to the students' educational outcomes. The harm is indirect but clearly linked to the AI system's use, as the AI replaces the students' own learning efforts. This fits the definition of an AI Incident because it involves harm to a group of people (students) through the use of an AI system. The article does not describe a hazard or a complementary information update but reports on realized harm due to AI use.[AI generated]