The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
Brazilian writer Fernando Morais filed a lawsuit in São Paulo against OpenAI, alleging ChatGPT was trained on and reproduces his copyrighted books without authorization. Morais seeks an injunction to stop the use of his works and demands compensation for material and moral damages, citing specific examples of content reproduction.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves an AI system (ChatGPT) whose development and use have directly led to a violation of intellectual property rights, a recognized harm under the AI Incident definition. The unauthorized use of Morais's copyrighted works for training the AI and the AI's reproduction of his content without consent or compensation constitutes a breach of legal protections for authors. This harm is materialized and ongoing, as evidenced by the legal action seeking indemnification. Hence, the event meets the criteria for an AI Incident rather than a hazard or complementary information.[AI generated]