
The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
Uber Japan and taxi operator Hinomaru Kotsu will jointly launch a robotaxi pilot in Tokyo in late 2026, deploying Nissan LEAF vehicles equipped with Wayve's AI Driver technology. The initiative, compliant with Japanese regulations, aims to introduce autonomous ride-hailing but has not yet reported any incidents or harm.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly mentions the use of an AI system (Wayve's AI Driver) for autonomous vehicle operation, which fits the definition of an AI system. The event concerns the planned use of this AI system in a real-world setting, which could plausibly lead to harm such as accidents or operational failures, especially given the complexity of Tokyo's driving environment. However, no harm has yet occurred, and the deployment is still in the pilot planning phase with safety operators onboard. Thus, it is an AI Hazard, reflecting a credible risk of future harm from the AI system's use. There is no indication of an actual incident or realized harm, so it is not an AI Incident. The article is not primarily about a response or update to a past event, so it is not Complementary Information. The AI system is not solely a countermeasure to an external harm, so it is not Beneficial Use. Therefore, the correct classification is AI Hazard.[AI generated]