Guida autonoma supervisionata, scontro Tesla-Ue: la battaglia dei dati prima del voto decisivo
2026-09-01
La Repubblica.it
The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
Two fatal crashes in the US involved Tesla vehicles with Autopilot or Full Self-Driving AI systems confirmed active. Federal investigations revealed Tesla withheld key data on the incidents, hindering transparency and public safety efforts. The incidents highlight risks associated with AI-driven vehicle automation.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
Both incidents involve AI systems (Tesla's Autopilot or Full Self-Driving) confirmed active during fatal crashes, directly linking AI system use to harm (fatalities). The AI systems' malfunction or failure to maintain safe operation is implicated, and Tesla's withholding of data impedes understanding and mitigation. This meets the definition of AI Incident as the AI system's use has directly or indirectly led to injury or harm to persons. The article does not describe potential or future harm but actual harm, so it is not an AI Hazard. It is not Complementary Information since the main focus is on the incidents themselves, not on responses or updates. It is not Beneficial Use or Unrelated.[AI generated]