The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
An Alberta sheriff used AI software to generate non-consensual nude images of three female coworkers from their social media photos. Although the conduct was deemed serious and harmful, no criminal charges were filed because Canadian law did not yet cover AI-generated intimate imagery at the time. The sheriff was removed from active duty pending investigation.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event clearly involves the use of an AI system to generate intimate images without consent, which is a violation of human rights and workplace safety, fulfilling the criteria for an AI Incident. The harm has already occurred, as the female co-workers' safety and dignity were impacted. The AI system's use was central to the harm, even though no criminal charges were filed. The internal investigation and removal from active duty are responses but do not negate the incident classification.[AI generated]