
The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
UK lawmakers, led by Lord Tim Clement-Jones, are proposing amendments to the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill to grant the government emergency powers to deactivate advanced AI systems and data centers if they threaten national security. The move aims to prevent potential harm from runaway AI impacting critical infrastructure.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves AI systems in the context of their potential to cause harm, specifically to critical infrastructure, which aligns with the definition of an AI Hazard. However, since no actual harm or incident has occurred, and the article primarily covers legislative and advocacy efforts to manage these risks, it does not qualify as an AI Incident. Additionally, the article is not merely general AI news or product announcements but focuses on governance responses to AI risks, fitting the criteria for Complementary Information. Nonetheless, because the main narrative centers on the plausible future harm and the proposed legal measures to prevent it, the classification as an AI Hazard is more appropriate here, as the event is about the credible risk and proposed interventions to prevent AI-related harm.[AI generated]