Authors Wrangle With Publishers Over $1.5 Billion Anthropic A.I. Settlement
2026-09-05
The New York Times
The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
Anthropic agreed to pay $1.5 billion to authors after its AI system, Claude, was trained on pirated books, violating copyright. As payments are distributed, disputes have arisen between authors, publishers, and agents over rightful shares, delaying compensation and highlighting unresolved copyright ownership issues. The incident centers in the United States.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly states that Anthropic used pirated books to train its AI chatbot, which is a direct violation of intellectual property rights, a form of harm under the AI Incident definition. The settlement and legal case confirm that harm has materialized. The dispute over settlement distribution among authors and publishers is a consequence of this harm. The AI system's development and use directly led to this violation, fulfilling the criteria for an AI Incident.[AI generated]