
The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
South Korea's Rural Development Administration and Korea Forest Service warn that relying on AI, including generative AI and photo identification apps, to determine wild mushroom edibility is dangerous and could lead to poisoning. Only 17% of native mushrooms are confirmed edible, and misidentification risks serious health harm or death.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article involves AI in the context of using AI systems (including generative AI) to judge mushroom edibility, which is explicitly stated as unreliable and dangerous. While no actual poisoning caused by AI is reported, the warning implies a credible risk that reliance on AI for this purpose could lead to harm (poisoning). This fits the definition of an AI Hazard, where the use or misuse of AI could plausibly lead to harm. There is no indication of an AI Incident (no realized harm caused by AI), nor is this complementary information or unrelated news. It is not a beneficial use of AI but a caution against AI misuse. Therefore, the classification is AI Hazard.[AI generated]