The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
Anthropic is facing a class action lawsuit alleging it misled customers about the usage limits of its Claude AI Max subscription plans. Plaintiffs claim the advertised 5x and 20x usage increases are not fully accessible due to hidden session and weekly caps, resulting in financial harm and deceptive marketing.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves an AI system (Anthropic's Claude) whose use and marketing have directly led to harm—specifically, financial harm and deceptive practices affecting users. The lawsuit alleges that the company misrepresented the capabilities and limits of its AI subscription service, causing users to pay for services they did not fully receive. This is a violation of legal obligations and consumer rights, which fits the definition of an AI Incident under violations of human rights or breach of applicable law. The harm is realized and ongoing, not merely potential, and the AI system's role is pivotal as the product at the center of the dispute.[AI generated]