The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
An international team of scientists published a study modeling large language models (LLMs) as a "cognitive virus," warning that excessive reliance on AI tools could lead to widespread cognitive dependency and reduced autonomy. The research highlights potential future risks but reports no actual harm, emphasizing the need for healthy AI use.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly involves AI systems (LLMs) and discusses their use and social diffusion. It does not describe any actual injury, rights violation, or other harm caused by AI, but rather a theoretical model and warning about plausible future cognitive harm due to overreliance on AI. This fits the definition of an AI Hazard, as it plausibly could lead to harm (cognitive harm and loss of autonomy) but no incident has yet materialized. The article also includes recommendations for healthy use, but these are part of the hazard discussion rather than a beneficial use event or complementary information about a past incident. Hence, the classification is AI Hazard.[AI generated]