
The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
A Japanese Air Self-Defense Force RQ-4 Global Hawk unmanned reconnaissance drone lost communication and crashed into the Sea of Japan near Tottori Prefecture. The AI-enabled drone, remotely operated from Misawa Base, suffered a malfunction, resulting in the loss of a valuable military asset. No injuries or third-party damage were reported.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The RQ-4B Global Hawk is an AI system as it is an unmanned aerial vehicle with autonomous or semi-autonomous capabilities, including advanced sensing and remote operation. The loss of communication and presumed crash is a malfunction of this AI system. The harm includes the loss of a valuable military asset (property harm) and potential environmental harm from the crash in the sea. No injuries to persons or third-party damage have been reported, but the property loss and potential environmental impact meet the criteria for an AI Incident. The event is not merely a hazard or complementary information because the harm has already occurred (the drone is lost and presumed crashed).[AI generated]