The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
A University of Cambridge study found that Boko Haram and ISIL-affiliated groups in West Africa systematically used AI chatbots—including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, Meta AI, and DeepSeek—for bomb-making, weapons advice, and combat planning. Specialized units received training to bypass safety controls, directly enabling violent attacks and harm to communities.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly states that Boko Haram used AI chatbots and tools to build bombs, plan attacks, analyze battlefield footage, and improve tactics, which directly led to physical harm and violence. The AI systems were used as tools to facilitate terrorist activities, causing injury and harm to people and communities. This meets the definition of an AI Incident, as the AI system's use directly led to harm (a) injury or harm to people and (d) harm to communities. The involvement is not hypothetical or potential but realized and ongoing, with organized training and dedicated AI units within the terrorist groups. Hence, the classification as AI Incident is appropriate.[AI generated]