The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
According to McKinsey's Technology Trends Outlook 2026, nearly 30% of companies experienced a decline in productivity after adopting agentic (autonomous) AI tools for software development. The report highlights operational setbacks and developer distrust, attributing the harm to unsystematic integration of these AI systems.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The McKinsey report explicitly states that 30% of companies experienced productivity decline after adopting agentic AI tools, indicating realized harm caused by AI use. The AI system is agentic AI for autonomous coding, clearly an AI system. The harm is operational and economic, which qualifies as harm to organizations and communities under the framework. The event is not merely a potential risk or a complementary update but a documented negative outcome directly linked to AI use. Therefore, it qualifies as an AI Incident.[AI generated]