Economist Warns AI Agents Could Trigger Rapid Bank Runs in the US

Thumbnail Image

The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.

Apollo Global Management's chief economist, Torsten Slok, warns that agentic AI assistants could automate and accelerate the migration of deposits from traditional US banks to higher-yield fintech accounts. This could trigger rapid, large-scale bank runs, threatening banks' funding stability and the broader financial system. No actual incident has occurred yet.[AI generated]

Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?

The article explicitly mentions AI money agents (agentic AI assistants) that could autonomously move deposits, which qualifies as AI system involvement. The economist's warning is about a plausible future harm where these AI systems could trigger a mass deposit flight, indirectly harming the financial system by reducing banks' cheap deposits. Since no actual harm has occurred yet, but the risk is credible and plausible, this event fits the definition of an AI Hazard rather than an AI Incident. It is not Complementary Information because the main focus is the warning about potential harm, not a response or update to a past event.[AI generated]
AI principles
SafetyAccountability

Industries
Financial and insurance services

Affected stakeholders
BusinessGeneral public

Harm types
Economic/PropertyPublic interest

Business function:
Other

AI system task:
Goal-driven organisation


Articles about this incident or hazard