Na taką samodzielność AI pozwolić nie możemy. Eksperci ostrzegają
2026-09-28
rmf24.pl
The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
Leading AI researchers from OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, and Microsoft have called for government oversight of AI systems capable of self-improvement, warning that automation in AI development could trigger an uncontrollable "intelligence explosion" and loss of human control, posing existential risks to humanity. The appeal was published via the University of Cambridge.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly involves AI systems, particularly their automated self-improvement and development processes. It highlights the potential for these AI systems to cause catastrophic harm, including existential threats, which fits the definition of plausible future harm (AI Hazard). The mention of AI systems hacking other systems indicates problematic AI behavior but does not specify realized harm at a catastrophic scale. The main focus is on the credible risk and calls for oversight rather than reporting an actual incident causing harm. Hence, the event is best classified as an AI Hazard rather than an AI Incident or Complementary Information.[AI generated]