US Appeals Court Upholds Ruling Against Ross Intelligence for AI Copyright Infringement

Thumbnail Image

The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.

A US federal appeals court upheld a ruling that Ross Intelligence infringed Thomson Reuters' copyright by using Westlaw headnotes to train its AI-powered legal search engine without fair use permission. The decision, a first in US courts, led to Ross shutting down its platform due to litigation costs.[AI generated]

Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?

The event involves an AI system (Ross Intelligence's AI tool) whose development included using copyrighted headnotes without fair use permission, leading to a legal dispute. This constitutes a violation of intellectual property rights, which is a recognized harm under the AI Incident definition. Since the court ruling confirms the infringement, the harm is realized, making this an AI Incident rather than a hazard or complementary information. The event is not merely an update or a general AI news item but a concrete legal decision about harm caused by AI development practices.[AI generated]
AI principles
AccountabilityRespect of human rights

Industries
Other

Affected stakeholders
Business

Harm types
Economic/Property

Business function:
Compliance and justice

AI system task:
Organisation/recommenders


Articles about this incident or hazard