
The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
A McKinsey & Co. report estimates that by 2035, artificial intelligence and automation could force about 11 million American workers—roughly 7% of the workforce—to change occupations. The transition is expected to disproportionately affect lower-income workers and require significant retraining and adaptation.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves AI systems causing or enabling displacement of workers, which is a plausible future harm to individuals and communities (economic and social harm). The article does not report actual realized harm but projects potential large-scale occupational changes and associated difficulties. The AI involvement is clear (AI adoption causing displacement). Since the harm is plausible but not yet realized, this fits the definition of an AI Hazard rather than an AI Incident. It is not Complementary Information because it is not an update or response to a past incident, nor is it Beneficial Use or Unrelated.[AI generated]