The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
A study by Green IT warns that by 2030, AI's environmental footprint—including CO2 emissions, energy, and water consumption—will far exceed sustainable limits in the EU, with impacts multiplied by seven compared to 2025. The expansion of AI infrastructure, especially datacenters, poses significant ecological and health risks.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly links AI systems (data centers, GPUs, AI infrastructure) to significant environmental harms that are ongoing and projected to worsen substantially. These harms include climate change contributions, resource depletion, and health impacts from particulate emissions. While no single event or malfunction is described, the cumulative and systemic environmental damage caused by AI's development and use is a clear harm. Since the harms are ongoing and projected to escalate, this fits the definition of an AI Hazard, as the AI systems' use could plausibly lead to or is already leading to significant harm. The article's focus is on raising awareness and calling for policy action, which supports the hazard classification rather than being merely complementary information or unrelated news.[AI generated]