
The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
The US Department of Defense awarded Israeli company Smart Shooter a contract worth up to $150 million to supply AI-powered SMASH rifle-mounted counter-drone systems. These systems use artificial intelligence, computer vision, and machine learning to autonomously detect and target drones, raising concerns about potential risks in military applications. The contract supports US defense efforts against drone threats.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly mentions AI-powered fire control systems used in counter-drone weapons, indicating the presence of an AI system. The event concerns the awarding of a contract for these systems, not an incident of harm caused by them. Since the systems are intended for military use with potential for harm if misused or malfunctioning, the event plausibly leads to future AI-related harm. There is no evidence of realized harm or a response to past harm, so it is not an AI Incident or Complementary Information. It is not Beneficial Use because the AI system itself is a weapon system, not a countermeasure to an external harm without introducing new harm. Hence, the classification is AI Hazard.[AI generated]