
The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
Chinese companies' widespread use of AI digital human interviewers, which analyze candidates' facial microexpressions and physiological signals, has triggered significant psychological discomfort and feelings of disrespect among job seekers. The AI systems' unnatural behavior and constant monitoring have led to public outcry and reports of the 'uncanny valley effect.'[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The event involves an AI system explicitly described as an AI digital interviewer that analyzes candidates' microexpressions, speech, and physiological signals to score and filter them. The use of this AI system has directly led to psychological harm and exclusion of candidates, which is harm to persons and communities. The article details realized harms such as stress, alienation, and unfair evaluation, not just potential risks. Hence, it meets the criteria for an AI Incident rather than a hazard or complementary information. The harms are clearly articulated and pivotal to the AI system's role in recruitment.[AI generated]