The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
The Norwegian government plans a temporary ban on AI-enabled smart glasses in public places due to privacy concerns, including covert recording. The ban covers parks, beaches, schools, hospitals, and more. An expert group will assess risks and recommend permanent regulations. No actual harm has occurred yet.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The AI glasses are AI systems with recording and AI assistant capabilities. The government's temporary ban is a response to plausible privacy harms (violation of rights) that could arise from their use in public and sensitive spaces. Since no actual harm or incident is reported yet, but a credible risk is recognized and regulatory action is being taken, this qualifies as an AI Hazard. The event is not an AI Incident because no realized harm is described, nor is it Complementary Information or Beneficial Use. It is not unrelated because AI systems are central to the issue.[AI generated]