
The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
A report by SemiAnalysis found that major Chinese AI developers, including Alibaba, Tencent, and Baidu, publicly disclosed safety test results for only 3.6% of their 857 published models. The lack of transparency raises concerns about potential risks from insufficient safety evaluation of AI systems in China.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article focuses on the lack of public safety testing disclosures by Chinese AI developers for their models, indicating a plausible risk that these AI systems could cause harm in the future due to insufficient safety evaluation and transparency. There is no mention of actual harm or incidents caused by these AI systems, so it does not meet the criteria for an AI Incident. The event describes a credible potential risk related to AI system development and deployment, fitting the definition of an AI Hazard. It is not merely complementary information because the main subject is the potential risk from insufficient safety testing disclosure, not a response or update to a past incident.[AI generated]