The information displayed in the AIM should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries.
Two young men in Chaco, Argentina, were arrested after allegedly using ChatGPT to plan mass shootings at schools and a university. The FBI detected suspicious queries on the AI platform and alerted Argentine authorities, leading to the suspects' detention and the seizure of weapons and electronic devices. No attack occurred.[AI generated]
Why's our monitor labelling this an incident or hazard?
The article explicitly mentions the use of ChatGPT, an AI system, by suspects to plan a mass shooting, which is a direct link between AI use and a potential harm to human life and community safety. The FBI's detection of queries to ChatGPT was pivotal in uncovering the planned attack, showing the AI system's involvement in the chain of events leading to harm (or prevention thereof). The event involves realized harm potential and law enforcement intervention based on AI system use, fitting the definition of an AI Incident. The presence of AI is explicit, the harm is significant (planned mass shooting), and the AI system's use is central to the event's unfolding.[AI generated]